the many roles of prose - the causual linkages
The many experi-mints conducted by crunch towards refresh the branding vs blanding debate in 2011 is turning into a rigorous relearning of prose and its elemental dna.
Questions like - what is at the innermost core of a story and what makes the nebula. at what point does the story start breathing and what is the point where its life begins to recede. if everything in the storyland is semantic and its interactions are semiotic, at what point does behavior collide with learning. To understand when to intervene - you must know what it is ... so what is it ... for crunch, the story is the creative reconstruction of context, personality and interaction. The real essence is in the deconstruction of cause. What causal linkages could lead to interesting stories.
Why CAUSE rules for crunch ... lets examine the meanings
Story: the telling of a happening or connected series of happenings, whether true or fictitious; account; narration
Narrative: the broadest sense is: anything told or recounted; more narrowly, something told or recounted in the form of a a story; account; tale.
Tale: something told or related; relation or a recital of happenings; or a story or account of true, legendary, or fictitious events; narrative; or a literary composition in narrative form
Springboard story: A springboard story is a story that enables a leap in understanding by the audience so as to grasp how an organization or community or complex system may change. A springboard story has an impact not so much through transferring large amounts of information, but through catalyzing understanding. It enables listeners to visualize from a story in one context what is involved in a large-scale transformation in an analogous context. (Find out more about springboard stories in The Secret Language of Leadership (2007) or The Leader's Guide to Storytelling (2005) or The Springboard (2000)
Anti-story: an anti-story is a story that arises in opposition to another. Any story that has a significant impact in a group or organization will give rise to similar stories ("That reminds me...") as well as anti-stories. Anti-stories aim at undermining the original story. As often pointed out by Dave Snowden, an anti-story can arise as a negative or cynical counter to stories of official goodness. But it's not limited to the situation of stories of official goodness. It also arises in response to negative or cynical stories where again the intent is to undermine the original story.
The phenomenon of anti-story is something that one needs to be aware of when telling stories in an organization. The phenomenon will occur spontaneously and naturally, no matter how powerful the story one tells. The scene then becomes a battle between competing stories. The competing stories may co-exist for an extended period, or one story may "overcome" the other, and become the accepted account of what is going on.
One can perhaps envisage a sequence: Story >> Anti-story >> Eventual Story
The Eventual Story may be the same as the original Story (if the original Story is "triumphant"), or the same as the Anti-story (if the opponents of that Story are "triumphant"), or perhaps a new story, combining elements of the original Story and the Anti-story.
Anti-story can be used as a powerful tool to undermine the position of one's opponents particularly where they are circulating untrue rumors or unreasonable criticism in the organization in Chapter 7 of The Leader's Guide to Storytelling.
The anti-story doesn't work very well against a rumor that is true or a criticism that is reasonable. In those situations, one should admit the truth and say what one is going to be done about it. In literature, stories with an anti-plot can emerge to undermine the idea that life has a plot with simple beginning, middle and ending. In Macbeth, Shakespeare powerfully expressed the anti-story viewpoint that life has no meaning (in a drama that is paradoxically full of meaning):
"Life .. is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing:" Macbeth, Act V, Scene v.
Lets look at its components that may cause engagement
The phenomenon of anti-story is something that one needs to be aware of when telling stories in an organization. The phenomenon will occur spontaneously and naturally, no matter how powerful the story one tells. The scene then becomes a battle between competing stories. The competing stories may co-exist for an extended period, or one story may "overcome" the other, and become the accepted account of what is going on.
One can perhaps envisage a sequence: Story >> Anti-story >> Eventual Story
The Eventual Story may be the same as the original Story (if the original Story is "triumphant"), or the same as the Anti-story (if the opponents of that Story are "triumphant"), or perhaps a new story, combining elements of the original Story and the Anti-story.
Anti-story can be used as a powerful tool to undermine the position of one's opponents particularly where they are circulating untrue rumors or unreasonable criticism in the organization in Chapter 7 of The Leader's Guide to Storytelling.
The anti-story doesn't work very well against a rumor that is true or a criticism that is reasonable. In those situations, one should admit the truth and say what one is going to be done about it. In literature, stories with an anti-plot can emerge to undermine the idea that life has a plot with simple beginning, middle and ending. In Macbeth, Shakespeare powerfully expressed the anti-story viewpoint that life has no meaning (in a drama that is paradoxically full of meaning):
"Life .. is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing:" Macbeth, Act V, Scene v.
The factual body of a story
1) an account of what has or might have happened, especially. in the form of a narrative, play, story, or tale;
2) what has happened in the life or development of a people, country, institution.
3) a systematic account of this, usually in chronological order with an analysis and explanation;
4) all recorded events of the past;
5) the branch of knowledge that deals systematically with the past; a recording, analyzing, correlating, and explaining of past events;
6) a known or recorded past
The nature of stories. Stories that are typically oral and ephemeral include:
Forms of story that are originally oral and to some extent enduring either through being told and retold, or through being written down, include:
Stories in written literature include:
What's the difference between "narrative" and "story"?
In common usage: none. therefore narrative and story can be used as synonyms ... in the broad sense of an account of a set of events that are causally related.One could fill a whole library with the academic discussion swirling around such a simple commonsense notion.
Various practitioners have suggested different definitions.
For some, story should be defined in the narrower sense of a well-told story, with a protagonist, a plot, and a turning point leading to a resolution. For them, narrative might be used in the broader sense I employ in this book. In this view, locutions that lack the traditional elements of a well-told story are not so much stories as ideas for possible stories yet to be told, or fragments of stories. (See for instance: Y. Gabriel, Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions and Fantasies -- Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Others have suggested that story should be used in the broader sense I am suggesting, while narrative should be used in the narrower sense of “a story as told by a narrator.” On this view, “narrative = story + theme”: the theme is a layer added to the story to instruct, to provide an emotional connection, or to impart a deeper meaning. (See for instance L. Vincent, Legendary Brands: Unleashing the Power of Storytelling to Create a Winning Market Strategy (Chicago: Dearborn Trade, 2002).
In practice, the actual everyday usage of both story and narrative is very broad. Polkinghorne and others have suggested that we accept this broad meaning and treat story and narrative as synonyms: D. E. Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988. Polkinghorne defines both narrative and story as “the fundamental scheme for linking individual human actions and events into interrelated aspects of an understandable composite.” Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, p. 13.
Within the broad field of story, we can then distinguish classically structured stories, well-made stories, minimalist stories, anti-stories, fragmentary stories, stories with no ending, stories with multiple endings, stories with multiple beginnings, stories with endings that circle back to the beginning, comedies, tragedies, detective stories, romances, folk tales, novels, theater, movies, television mini-series, and so on, without the need to get into quasi-theological discussions as to what is truly a story.
In common usage, story is a large tent, with many variations within the tent. Some variations are more useful for some purposes than others. There are probably many variations that haven’t yet been identified. If we start out with predetermined ideas of what a “real story” is, we may end up missing useful forms of narrative.
References:
Stephen Denning, The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations. Boston, London, Butterworth Heinemann, October 2000.
Donald E. Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1988.
Comments
Post a Comment